Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Timothy Burke's avatar

The "household as locus of production shared by men and women" model is at least a very different invocation of 'traditional family' than the bourgeois domestic private sphere as the place of women , and interesting as a result. But the headache for me is as always that what is floated as a universal history (before modernity, this is 'tradition' everywhere) is just empirically wrong. Companionate monogamy in a single shared household in a fixed location that recognized and sanctified by the state or by a church with temporal authority is not at all the human norm over the longue duree; what's more typical is polygyny, concubinage, or families that are bifocal or multifocal (e.g., have multiple households that are dispersed over considerable amounts of space, with one or more parents moving seasonally or otherwise between the two of them). What someone like Harrington means by 'traditional' in that sense is not "the way human beings naturally live in family or naturally raise children" but specifically a kind of "the West just before industrialization as a kind of moral Arcadia".

Expand full comment
nescio13's avatar

Harrington is willing to be very contextual so I don't think her model is meant to be universal.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts