Full disclosure: out of the blue a while ago Jonathan Strassfeld (Hopkins) sent me a gratis copy of his (2022) Inventing Philosophy’s Other: Phenomenology in America (The University of Chicago Press), which seems to be based on his PhD in History from the University of Rochester.
The opening sentence of Stone's paper "David Lewis is in many ways a successor to Carnap." is striking since I am currently trying to work out where my analysis of bounded awareness (working with Ani Guerdjikova) stands in relation to Carnap and Lewis, whom we have been considering separately. This gets us towrds belief revision, which seems to be the main concern of Stone's paper, though I couldn't follow all of it.
As always, I'm struck by the extent to which decision theory and epistemology seem to proceed on parallel tracks, rarely interacting
Friend of this blog, Richard Pettigrew, has been doing work bridging the decision theory and epistemology gap. He has a super interesting blog himself.
The opening sentence of Stone's paper "David Lewis is in many ways a successor to Carnap." is striking since I am currently trying to work out where my analysis of bounded awareness (working with Ani Guerdjikova) stands in relation to Carnap and Lewis, whom we have been considering separately. This gets us towrds belief revision, which seems to be the main concern of Stone's paper, though I couldn't follow all of it.
As always, I'm struck by the extent to which decision theory and epistemology seem to proceed on parallel tracks, rarely interacting
Friend of this blog, Richard Pettigrew, has been doing work bridging the decision theory and epistemology gap. He has a super interesting blog himself.
Indeed, we interact reasonably often. It is a small world. But crossover of this kind is limited