Today’s post is on the non-trivial ways in which the so-called ‘rule of law’ presupposes that the functionaries of the law carry themselves with integrity in the performance of their station and duties.
I've always seen Bright viewed very positively (more so than Cobden, I think). There's a character in Trollope's Palliser novels obviously based on Bright. Presented somewhat critically, as you'd expect from Trollope, but in a way that definitely made him appear as a radical democrat.
A minor point, in the last sentence of the fourth paragraph, I think "The Quacker Bright..." is meant to be "The Quaker Bright...".
Thank you for catching that. Unfortunately, I don't have funding to pay for a copy-editor so I rely on the generosity of my readers.
I've always seen Bright viewed very positively (more so than Cobden, I think). There's a character in Trollope's Palliser novels obviously based on Bright. Presented somewhat critically, as you'd expect from Trollope, but in a way that definitely made him appear as a radical democrat.