3 Comments
User's avatar
Axel Mueller's avatar

“ But in so far as political philosophy aspires to educate the thoughtful citizenry in the reasons for its commitments (it should hold), Stebbing's book is, warts and all (and I have not developed my criticisms here), without parallel in early analytic philosophy. (No, I am not ignoring Popper or Russell's political essays!)” There’s one omission here that was, among the players familiar with Austria and Vienna (cough cough: circle), very well known and deeply republican while at the same time realist of sorts as well: Kelsey’s “Essence and Value of Democracy” (which also is unjustly forgotten and counted falsely as positivist —despite being precisely presented as an elaboration of the *ideals* of democracy (freedom and equality).

Expand full comment
nescio13's avatar

Thank you for the suggestion!

Expand full comment
Matt Lister's avatar

"the narrative that there 'was no political philosophy within analytic philosophy' before Rawls is a lie that keeps us in a self-imposed tutelage."

This seems to me to distort what people say about the important of Rawls's work in a pretty important way!

Expand full comment